Thiago Alcantara is a rather unique breed of footballer, the type of player who will be almost universally enjoyed such are his breath-taking technical attributes.
It’s like he rolls the passing talents of Juan Roman Riquelme and first touch of Ronaldinho into a single player and saunters around the pitch ensuring the game is played at a pace dictated by him.
His Liverpool career feels a lot shorter than it actually has been because of his absence through injury, and he’ll be hoping his recent return is the catalyst to kick-starting what is resembling a fairly meek title defence.
But while Thiago has shown flashes of his immense ability in his fledgling Liverpool career, it appears not all are entirely convinced.
Former Reds midfielder Dietmar Hamann expressed his reservations in an interview with talkSPORT on Tuesday, suggesting Thiago is detrimental to a key part of Liverpool’s play; utilising a quick tempo with hard-working midfielders who look to get the ball forward to the front three as soon as possible.
Hamann urged Liverpool to be cautious about how much influence they let Thiago have, questioning his effectiveness when not in possession and suitability to the Reds’ system, concerns that won’t have been eased by Thursday’s shock defeat to Burnley.
But does this give a fair reflection of Thiago?
— Thiago Alcantara (@Thiago6) January 17, 2021
An unnecessary luxury?
First of all, there are only so many conclusions you can make regarding Thiago and his time at Liverpool because he has not featured particularly often, as previously highlighted.
But the fact is, Liverpool’s record in Premier League games he has featured in is quite poor, with only one of those six ending in a victory.
That win came in his Premier League debut, a 2-0 victory at Chelsea back in September – that’s right, it was the game where he completed 75 passes despite only coming on at half-time, a record since Opta began recording such data in 2003-04 among players to play a maximum of 45 minutes.
The hype after that match was stratospheric – the champions had seemingly added the final string to their bow and they were seemingly set to overwhelm everyone, but it’s worth bearing in mind that was a Chelsea side reduced to 10 men before Thiago had even come on.
Liverpool average just one point per game with Thiago, that more than doubles to 2.2 when he hasn’t played – additionally, their win percentage rockets from 16.7 to 61.5 in games the Spaniard hasn’t featured in.
Of course, it’s a relatively small sample size, so perhaps take the facts with a pinch of salt – but there are metrics that can shine more light on Thiago’s influence.
One of Hamann’s major reservations related to Thiago’s desire to dictate play and how he might, in the long run, negatively impact Liverpool’s effectiveness off the ball.
“Liverpool were always good when they weren’t in possession, won it and played quickly forward. He’s not that type of player, so it will be very interesting when he does play more often now how it’s going to change the dynamics of the team,” Hamann said.
It’s true, Liverpool do have more of the ball (65.7 per cent compared to 64.7) with Thiago in the side, but the difference is negligible and certainly cannot be pointed to as a cause for worry.
75 – Half-time substitute Thiago completed more passes (75) than any Chelsea player managed in the entire match. Since full passing data is available for the Premier League (2003-04), his 75 successful passes are the most by a player who played a maximum of 45 minutes. Control. pic.twitter.com/UvHfrw1ggN
— OptaJoe (@OptaJoe) September 20, 2020
The supply line
Then there’s the concerns relating to Thiago’s style of play potentially impacting supply to the frontline. Well, the Reds average 18.7 shots per game when he plays (up from 14.9 without him).
There is also no damning evidence to suggest Thiago isn’t looking to feed the forwards either, after all, he passed to Mohamed Salah 11 times (a joint high) against Manchester United last weekend.
He has picked out Salah 36 times in their 365 minutes on the pitch together – so, once every 10.1 minutes. Although that’s less frequent than he passes to Trent Alexander-Arnold (once per every 8.2 minutes) and Andy Robertson (8.8 minutes), it shows he is supplying the Reds’ most-threatening forward regularly.
And while the two full-backs had off days against Burnley, can you really blame Thiago for passing to them often? Since the start of last season, they are Liverpool’s leading providers of shooting opportunities.
Additionally, his 14.9 passes into final third of the pitch per 90 minutes is second only to Jordan Henderson (16.2) among Liverpool players this term – Thiago beats him, and every other Red, in terms of successful passes in the attacking third every game, however (25.8, compared to Henderson’s 20.5).
Boss x Thiago pic.twitter.com/SVajJtyluY
— Liverpool FC (@LFC) December 23, 2020
“He’s not that type of player”
It’s fair to say Thiago probably isn’t best known for what he brings to teams off the ball, but despite some seemingly questioning him in this department, he appears to be at least pulling his weight.
In fact, he’s averaging marginally more tackles per 90 minutes than Henderson (1.5 over 1.4), while no one in the Liverpool team is intercepting opposition passes as frequently as the Barcelona product (2.8 per 90 mins).
On top of that, he’s ranked third in the squad for duel involvements (14.7 per 90 mins) – while not necessarily an indicator of excellence on its own, that should at the very least dispel any questions regarding his work rate.
On an individual level when you look at the data, Thiago doesn’t appear to be out of place stylistically. While he may occasionally spend more time on the ball than some of his midfield contemporaries, he possesses the kind of technical wizardry that arguably no other Liverpool player has and that is surely a positive rather than a negative.
He’s also clearly a hard-working player who offers plenty off the ball. So, while the Reds are going through a tricky patch at the moment, Thiago’s abilities should be embraced rather than looked upon with suspicion.